Confession
by Leo Tolstoy
III
So I lived, abandoning myself to this insanity for another six
years, till my marriage. During that time I went abroad. Life in
Europe and my acquaintance with leading and learned Europeans [3]
confirmed me yet more in the faith of striving after perfection
in which I believed, for I found the same faith among them. That
faith took with me the common form it assumes with the majority
of educated people of our day. It was expressed by the word
"progress". It then appeared to me that this word meant
something. I did not as yet understand that, being tormented (like
every vital man) by the question how it is best for me to live,
in my answer, "Live in conformity with progress", I was
like a man in a boat who when carried along by wind and waves
should reply to what for him is the chief and only question.
"whither to steer", by saying, "We are being
carried somewhere".
Note 3. Russians generally make a distinction between
Europeans and Russians. —A.M.
I did not then notice this. Only occasionally — not by reason
but by instinct — I revolted against this superstition so common
in our day, by which people hide from themselves their lack of
understanding of life....So, for instance, during my stay in
Paris, the sight of an execution revealed to me the instability
of my superstitious belief in progress. When I saw the head part
from the body and how they thumped separately into the box, I
understood, not with my mind but with my whole being, that no
theory of the reasonableness of our present progress could
justify this deed; and that though everybody from the creation of
the world had held it to be necessary, on whatever theory, I knew
it to be unnecessary and bad; and therefore the arbiter of what
is good and evil is not what people say and do, nor is it
progress, but it is my heart and I. Another instance of a
realization that the superstitious belief in progress is
insufficient as a guide to life, was my brother's death. Wise,
good, serious, he fell ill while still a young man, suffered for
more than a year, and died painfully, not understanding why he
had lived and still less why he had to die. No theories could
give me, or him, any reply to these questions during his slow and
painful dying. But these were only rare instances of doubt, and I
actually continued to live professing a faith only in progress.
"Everything evolves and I evolve with it: and why it is that
I evolve with all things will be known some day." So I ought
to have formulated my faith at that time.
On returning from abroad I settled in the country and
chanced to occupy myself with peasant schools. This work was
particularly to my taste because in it I had not to face the
falsity which had become obvious to me and stared me in the face
when I tried to teach people by literary means. Here also I acted
in the name of progress, but I already regarded progress itself
critically. I said to myself: "In some of its developments
progress has proceeded wrongly, and with primitive peasant
children one must deal in a spirit of perfect freedom, letting
them choose what path of progress they please." In reality I
was ever revolving round one and the same insoluble problem,
which was: How to teach without knowing what to teach. In the
higher spheres of literary activity I had realized that one could
not teach without knowing what, for I saw that people all taught
differently, and by quarrelling among themselves only succeeded
in hiding their ignorance from one another. But here, with
peasant children, I thought to evade this difficulty by letting
them learn what they liked. It amuses me now when I remember how
I shuffled in trying to satisfy my desire to teach, while in the
depth of my soul I knew very well that I could not teach anything
needful for I did not know what was needful. After spending a
year at school work I went abroad a second time to discover how
to teach others while myself knowing nothing.
And it seemed to me that I had learnt this aborad, and in the
year of the peasants' emancipation (1861) I returned to Russia
armed with all this wisdom, and having become an Arbiter [4] I
began to teach, both the uneducated peasants in schools and the
educated classes through a magazine I published. Things appeared
to be going well, but I felt I was not quite sound mentally and
that matters could not long continue in that way. And I should
perhaps then have come to the state of despair I reached fifteen
years later had there not been one side of life still unexplored
by me which promised me happiness: that was my marriage.
Note 4. To keep peace between peasants and owners. —A.M.
For a year I busied myself with arbitration work, the schools,
and the magazine; and I became so worn out — as a result
especially of my mental confusion — and so hard was my struggle
as Arbiter, so obscure the results of my activity in the schools,
so repulsive my shuffling in the magazine (which always amounted
to one and the same thing: a desire to teach everybody and to
hide the fact that I did not know what to teach), that I fell
ill, mentally rather than physically, threw up everything, and
went away to the Bashkirs in the steppes, to breathe fresh air,
drink kumys [5], and live a merely animal life.
Note 5. A fermented drink prepared from mare's milk. —A.M.
Returning from there I married. The new conditions of happy
family life completely diverted me from all search for the
general meaning of life. My whole life was centred at that time
in my family, wife and children, and therefore in care to
increase our means of livelihood. My striving after self-perfection,
for which I had already substituted a striving for perfection in
general, i.e. progress, was now again replaced by the effort
simply to secure the best possible conditions for myself and my
family.
So another fifteen years passed.
In spite of the fact that I now regarded authorship as of no
importance — the temptation of immense monetary rewards and
applause for my insignificant work — and I devoted myself to it
as a means of improving my material position and of stifling in
my soul all questions as to the meaning of my own life or life in
general.
I wrote: teaching what was for me the only truth, namely, that
one should live so as to have the best for oneself and one's
family.
So I lived; but five years ago something very strange began to
happen to me. At first I experienced moments of perplexity and
arrest of life, and though I did not know what to do or how to
live; and I felt lost and became dejected. But this passed and I
went on living as before. Then these moments of perplexity began
to recur oftener and oftener, and always in the same form. They
were always expressed by the questions: What is it for? What does
it lead to?
At first it seemed to me that these were aimless and
irrelevant questions. I thought that it was all well known, and
that if I should ever wish to deal with the solution it would not
cost me much effort; just at present I had no time for it, but
when I wanted to I should be able to find the answer. The
questions however began to repeat themselves frequently, and to
demand replies more and more insistently; and like drops of ink
always falling on one place they ran together into one black blot.
Then occurred what happens to everyone sickening with a mortal
internal disease. At first trivial signs of indisposition appear
to which the sick man pays no attention; then these signs
reappear more and more often and merge into one uninterrupted
period of suffering. The suffering increases, and before the sick
man can look round, what he took for a mere indisposition has
already become more important to him than anything else in the
world — it is death!
That is what happened to me. I understood that it was no
casual indisposition but something very important, and that if
these questions constantly repeated themselves they would have to
be answered. And I tried to answer them. The questions seemed
such stupid, simple, childish ones; but as soon as I touched them
and tried to solve them I at once became convinced, first, that
they are not childish and stupid but the most important and
profound of life's questions; and secondly that, occupying myself
with my Samara estate, the education of my son, or the writing of
a book, I had to know why I was doing it. As long as I did not
know why, I could do nothing and could not live. Amid the
thoughts of estate management which greatly occupied me at that
time, the question would suddenly occur: "Well, you will
have 6,000 desyatinas [6] of land in Samara Government and 300
horses, and what then?" ... And I was quite disconcerted and
did not know what to think. Or when considering plans for the
education of my children, I would say to myself: "What for?"
Or when considering how the peasants might become prosperous, I
would suddenly say to myself: "But what does it matter to
me?" Or when thinking of the fame my works would bring me, I
would say to myself, "Very well; you will be more famous
than Gogol or Pushkin or Shakespeare or Moliere, or than all the
writers in the world — and what of it?" And I could find no
reply at all. The questions would not wait, they had to be
answered at once, and if I did not answer them it was impossible
to live. But there was no answer.
Note 6. The desyatina is about 2.75 acres. —A.M.
I felt that what I had been standing on had collapsed and that
I had nothing left under my feet. What I had lived on no longer
existed, and there was nothing left.
The
Classical Library, This HTML edition copyright ©2001.
|